黑料传送门

By Justin B. Dickerson, Ph.D., MBA

To me, the answer is simple. Companies like NVIDIA represent the future state of Artificial Intelligence, not the current state of AI. The reason for that divide is simple 鈥� the most important word in AI technology is: 鈥渄emocratization.鈥�

GPUs are expensive, especially compared to their mainstream counterpart, the Central Processing Unit. GPUs are not mainstream, whereas the CPU is found in nearly every computer on the market today. But what qualifies as expensive is in the 鈥渆ye of the beholder.鈥� GPUs look expensive because the lack of mainstream utility shows limited value relative to the CPU. How did the CPU come to occupy its place in the mainstream world of technology? Quite simply, the technology was democratized.

The democratization of technology refers to the availability of a product or service to more people. And when availability increases, new utility for the product is discovered. When utility of the product is discovered, adoption increases. Eventually, adoption becomes mainstream.

In the case of the CPU, democratization occurred because of the development of the personal computer. What鈥檚 interesting is the democratization of the personal computer itself relied on the democratization of programming. By virtue of the invention of Microsoft Windows, the 鈥減oint and click鈥� graphical interface democratized programming to the mainstream.

How does AI get democratized in a way that allows for mass adoption of advanced technology such as NVIDIA GPUs? In much the same way Microsoft Windows broke down the programming barrier to democratize the use of personal computers and the CPU, AI will also require new technology to facilitate its adoption into the mainstream.

The future of NVIDIA GPUs can鈥檛 be reliant on the relatively narrow fields of data center management and high-end graphics for the gaming industry. Such AI technologies need to drive more use cases and become a pervasive part of the mainstream in the same way personal computing dominates our daily lives. As more of those use cases are discovered, either the costs of AI adoption will come down, or the justification for those higher costs will be more widely accepted.

One of the important questions about the democratization of AI is who will drive the change necessary for greater availability and adoption of AI technology? Today, that domain rests with highly-trained data scientists and like-minded programmers. These professionals are in very short supply, and as a result, there aren鈥檛 enough of them to help democratize AI to the mainstream.

The educational opportunities to increase the supply of these professionals are limited in many ways. First, traditional university computer science departments can鈥檛 meet the demand to produce these professionals. As recently reported, many universities can鈥檛 even maintain enough faculty members to effectively educate students. And there is also the issue of onerous pre-requisite requirements that limit who is eligible to join a traditional computer science program in the first place.

As a result of these issues and the costs of traditional higher education, many individuals turn to 鈥渂ootcamps鈥� for their training. However, these organizations can also be very expensive and lack the mainstream recognition afforded to institutions of higher learning. Students can also turn to low-cost or free Massive Open Online Courses. While these opportunities are built to address the problem of democratizing AI, there is concern about the integration of these courses into a cogent education of the next generation of AI professionals, and many of these opportunities provide no means for students to demonstrate competency of the course material. The result is a haphazard confluence of professionals trained in many different ways which might not reflect quality AI education.聽

To address the problem of democratizing AI and to generate more mainstream uses of AI for companies like NVIDIA, we must do two things. First, education itself must be democratized.聽Anyone from any background should be given the opportunity to learn how to program and fill the widening gap of professionals available to move AI forward. By democratizing education we should see a greater diversity of thought enter the AI field which should drive more use case discoveries and facilitate even faster adoption of AI.

This democratization of education needs to produce professionals who鈥檝e obtained their training from a program that is accredited for its quality and ability to consistently produce professionals who can prove their competency in the AI field. Second, AI education needs to be integrated into the curriculum of adjacent disciplines such as Business, Information Technology, Healthcare, and others. In short, if we don鈥檛 want to stymie the growth of revolutionary AI technology, we must quickly democratize the availability of AI education to generate the demand for such technology.

Democratizing AI education won鈥檛 be easy. Organizations like Western Governors University provide the opportunity for anyone to join the AI field and graduate with demonstrated competency. By focusing on education versus administration and demonstrating competency versus measuring time sitting in a classroom, we鈥檙e able to offer industry-relevant educational credentials at an unbelievably low cost. However, there aren鈥檛 enough institutions like us in the education market. We believe our model is one of the surest ways to generate the next generation of AI professionals to democratize the technology. But it will ultimately require a shift in traditional education thinking to create enough AI professionals to in turn create enough market opportunities for companies like NVIDIA to thrive. Who is ready to democratize AI education with us?